El aporte de las tecnologías sociales y factores determinantes para el cultivo de plantas medicinales: una revisión sistemática
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20435/inter.v24i2.3466Palabras clave:
hierbas medicinales, administración, técnicasResumen
El objetivo de este estudio es demostrar cómo las tecnologías sociales en el cultivo y manejo de plantas medicinales han sido abordadas por la literatura internacional en los últimos quince años. Los procedimientos metodológicos se clasifican en tipo de investigación exploratoria y bibliográfica, con una revisión sistemática de la literatura en la plataforma Web of Science (WoS) como búsqueda principal y SciELO como búsqueda secundaria, inmersos en un enfoque cualitativo de carácter investigativo simple o básico, que reúne una rica colección de revistas científicas internacionales disponibles en línea y de forma gratuita, publicadas durante el período 2006 a 2021. Los resultados de los estudios mostraron que las plantas medicinales promueven, de manera específica y acorde con las condiciones regionales y agroecológicas, la permanencia de los productores rurales en el campo; pero, con una necesidad de permanencia y continuidad de las actividades, es cada vez más importante que las tecnologías sociales estén presentes para concientizar sobre la importancia de las soluciones tecnocráticas. Los estudios tomaron diferentes enfoques en cada región, encontrando convergencias y divergencias en la forma de convivir y manejar las hierbas medicinales. Las técnicas y el manejo involucran fuertemente temas ambientales, sociales, culturales y políticos, que carecen de la difusión de información, entre otros vacíos observados en la investigación, para un mejor aprovechamiento beneficioso para la sociedad.
Citas
ADHIKARI, L. et al. Transforming the lives of mountain women through the Himalayan nettle value chain: a case study from Darchula, far west Nepal. [Case study]. Mountain Research and Development, Bern, v. 38, n. 1, p. 4–10, 2018
ALUKO, Y. A. Women's use of indigenous knowledge for environmental security and sustainable development in southwest Nigeria. The International Indigenous Policy Journal, [s.l.], v. 9, n. 3, 2018. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.18584/iipj.2018.9.3.2
AMEKAWA, Y.; SSEGUYA, H.; ONZERE, S; CARRANZA, I. Delineating the multifunctional role of agroecological practices: toward sustainable livelihoods for smallholder farmers in developing countries. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, [s.l.], v. 34, n. 2, p. 202–28, 2010.
ASHBY, J. HEINRICH G., BURPEE G., REMINGTON T., WILSON K., QUIROS C. A., ALDANA M., FERRIS S. What farmers want: collective capacity for sustainable entrepreneurship. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, [s.l.], v. 7, n. 2, 2009, p. 130–46.
BAKKEGAARD, R. K.; NIELSEN, M.; THORSEN, B. Household determinants of bushmeat and eru (Gnetum africanum) harvesting for cash in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Environment, Development and Sustainability, [s.l.], v. 19, n. 4, p. 1425–43, 2017.
BEREZNITSKY, S. V. Transforming impact of government and private salt trade of life-supporting technologies of indigenous peoples of the Amur-Sakhalin region in the XIX, Bylye Gody, United States, v. 56, p. 541–48, 2020.
BORTOLUZZI, R. N.; MOREIRA, L. L.; VIEIRA, C. R. Diversidade de plantas alimentares em quintais agroflorestais de Cuiabá e Várzea Grande, Mato Grosso, Brasil. Interações, Campo Grande, MS, v. 22, n. 1, p. 295–307, jan./mar. 2021.
BUECHLER, S. Gendered vulnerabilities and grassroots adaptation initiatives in home gardens and small orchards in Northwest Mexico. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com. Ambio, [s.l.], v. 45, Suppl. 3, p. S322–S334, 2016.
CHARNLEY, S.; POE, M. Community forestry in theory and practice: where arewe now? Annual Review Anthropology, Stanford, v. 6, p. 301–36, 2007. [by University of Vermont Libraries in 2008; for personal use only.]
CRAMB, R.; COLFER, C. J. P.; DRESSLER, W.; LAUNGARAMSRI, P. Chiang Mai University Swidden Transformations and Rural Livelihoods in Southeast Asia. Human Ecology, Asia, v. 37, n. 3, p. 323–46, 2009.
CORRÊA, C. C.; ALVES, A. F. Plantas medicinais como alternativa de negócios: caracterização e importância. Revista Brasileira Multidisciplinar [ReBram], v. 23, n. 1, p. 14-48, 2020.
DAGNINO, R. (Org.). Estudos sociais da ciência e tecnologia e política de ciência e tecnologia: abordagens alternativas para uma nova América Latina. Campina Grande: EDUEPB, 2010.
DAGNINO, R. Tecnologia Social: contribuições conceituais e metodológicas [online]. Campina Grande: EDUEPB, 2014.
DAROLT, M. R. Conexão ecológica: novas relações entre agricultores e consumidores. Londrina: IAPAR, 2012. 162 p.
DAS CHAGAS OLIVEIRA, F., ANGEL C. C.; LEITE C. L. Peasant innovations and the search for sustainability: the case of Carnaubais territory in Piauí state, Brazil. Journal of sustainable agriculture, United Nations, v. 36, n. 5, p. 523–44, 2012.
DUQUE, T. O.; VALADÃO, J. A. D. Abordagens Teóricas de Tecnologia Social no Brasil. Revista Pensamento Contemporâneo em Administração, São Paulo, v. 11, n. 5, p. 1–19, 2017.
DUTTA, M. J.; THAKER, J. ‘Communication sovereignty' as resistance: strategies adopted by women farmers amid the agrarian crisis in India. Journal of Applied Communication Research, USA, v. 47, n. 1, p. 24–4, 2019.
EMOTIUK, A. J SEMOTIUK, L. N.; EZCURRA, E. The eruption of technology in tradicional medicine: how social media guides the sale of natural plant products in the Sonjoran Desert Region. Economic Botany, Germany, v. 69, n. 4, p. 360–69, 2015.
GIL, A. C. Métodos e técnicas de pesquisa social. 6. ed. São Paulo: Altas, 2008.
GOTOR, E.; CARACCIOLO, F. ; CANTO, G.; AL NUSAIRI, M. Improving rural livelihoods through the conservation and use of underutilized species: evidence from a community research project in Yemen. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, v. 11, n. 4, p. 347–62. 2013.
HENDERSON, C. R. The scope of social technology. American Journal of Sociology, Chicago, v.6, n. 4, p. 465–86, jan. 1901.
HENKHAUS, N. Plant science decadal vision 2020–2030: reimagining the potential of plants for a healthy and sustainable future. American Society of plants biologists. 28 February 2020. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pld3.252
HONG, L.; ZHUO, J.; LEI, Q.; ZHOU, J.; AHMED, S.; WANG, C.; LONG, Y.; LI, F.; LONG, C. Ethnobotany of wild plants used for starting fermented beverages in Shui communities of southwest China. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, USA, v. 11, 2015. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13002-015-0028-0
KAMWI, J. M. J. M.; CHIRWA, F. P.; GRAZ, S. O. M.; MANDA, A. W.; MOSIMANE, C. K. Livelihood activities and skills in rural areas of the Zambezi Region, Namibia: implications for Policy and Poverty Reduction. African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development, Zambebe, v. 18, n. 1, e13074 (21), 2018.
KAUFMAN, A.; MOCK, J. Cultivating greater well-being: the benefits thai organic farmers experience from adopting buddhist eco-spirituality. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, Germany, v. 27, n. 6, p. 871–93, 2014.
MAC MONAGAIL, M. et al. Sustainable harvesting of wild seaweed resources. European journal of phycology, Germany, v. 52, n. 4, p. 371–90. 2017.
MATUS, C. Política, planificação e governo. Brasília: IPEA, 1996.
MAZID, A.; SHIDEED, K.; AMRI, A. Assessment of on-farm conservation of dryland agrobiodiversity and its impact on rural livelihoods in the Fertile Crescent. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, Germany, v. 29, n. 4, p. 366–77, 2014.
MONTEIRO, D.; GUEDES, C. A. M. Desenvolvimento rural no Sertão do São Francisco, Bahia: uma interpretação a partir de trajetórias de famílias agricultoras do território. Interações, Campo Grande, MS, v. 22, n. 1, p. 83–102, jan./mar. 2021.
NASUKHOVA, N. M.; LOGVINENKO, L. A.; KHARCHENKO, A. L.; KONOVALOV, D. A.; Biologically active substances of the laurus nobilis leaves, Pharmacy & Pharmacology, Germany, v. 5, n. 3, 2017.
OESTREICHER, J. ; FARELLA, N.; PAQUET, S.; DAVIDSON, R.; LUCOTTE, M.; MERTENS, F.; SAINT-CHARLES, J. Livelihood activities and land-use at a riparian frontier of the Brazilian Amazon: quantitative characterization and qualitative insights into the influence of knowledge, values, and beliefs. Springer Science, Business Media New York, 2014. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10745-014-9667-3, Human Ecology, v. 42, n. 4, p. 521–40.
PEREIRA, C. G.; SILVA, R. R.; LAVOIE, J. R.; PORTO, G. S. Technological cooperation network in biotechnology. Innovation & Management Review, Germany, v. 15, n. 4, p. 416–34, 2018.
PEREIRA, M. M. A.; MORAIS, L. C.; MARTINS, A. D.; LUZ, J. M. Q.; PASQUAL, M.; OLIVEIRA, R. C.; DÓRIA. J. Challenges of organic agriculture for the production of composts and vermicompost for the production of medicinal plants – a socioeconomic demand. Bioscience Journal, Uberlândia, v. 36, suppl. 1., p. 71–82, nov./dec., 2020.
QUIROGA, M.; MARTIN, D. Technology foresight in traditional Bolivian sectors: Innovation traps and temporal unfit between ecosystems and institutions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, v. 119, p. 280, 2017.
RIBEIRO, L. H. L. Analysis of medicinal plant and herbal medicine programs in the Unified Health System (SUS) from the territorial perspective. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, v. 24, n. 5, p. 1733–42, 2019.
RODRIGUES, T. D.; LEANDRO NETO, J.; GALVÃO, D. O. (Org.). Meio ambiente, sustentabilidade e agroecologia. Ponta Grossa (PR): Atena Editora, 2019. (Meio Ambiente, Sustentabilidade e Agroecologia, v. 1).
ROY, M.; MCDONALD, L.; EMENDACK, Y. Reflections on farmers’ social networks: a means for sustainable agricultural development? Environment Development and Sustainability, Germany, v. 1. N1. March 2021.
SEGHIERI, J. Shea tree (Vitellaria paradoxa Gaertn. f.): from local constraints to multi-scale improvement of economic, agronomic and environmental performance in an endemic Sudanian multipurpose agroforestry species. Agroforestry Systems, Nigeria, v. 93, n. 6, p. 2313–30, 2019.
STANIFER, J. W.; TURNER, E. L.; EGGER, J. R. THIELMA, N.; KARIS, F.; MARO, V.; KILONZO, K. PATEL, U. D.; YEATES, K. Knowledge, Attitudes, and practices associated with Chronic Kidney Disease in Northern Tanzania: a community-based study. Plod One, jun. 2016.
STRONG, N.; JACOBSON, M. A case for consumer-driven extension programming: agroforestry adoption potential in Pennsylvania. Agroforestry Systems, Germany, v. 68, n. 1, p. 43–52, 2006.
TITTIKPINA, N. K.; EJIKE, C. E. C. C.; ESTEVAM, E. C..; NASIM, J.; GRIFFIN, S.; CHAIMBAULT, P.; KIRSCH, G.; ATAKPAMA, W.; BATAWILA, K.; JACOB, C. Togo to go: products and compounds derived from local plants for the treatment of diseases endemic in sub-saharan Africa. African Journal of Traditional, Complementary and Alternative Medicines, Vol. 13 No. 1 (2016), 2016.
TIWARI, P. Recent Trends in therapeutic approaches for diabetes management: a comprehensive update. Journal of Diabetes Research, Germany, v. 2, n. 3, 2015.
WIERSUM, K. F.; DOLD, A.P.; HUSSELMAN, M.; COCKS, M. Cultivation of medicinal plants as a tool for biodiversity conservation and poverty alleviaton in the amatola region, south Africa. p. 43–57, 2006.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2023 Renan Silva Ferreira, Leonardo Balcewicz Junior, Geysler Bertolini
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Direitos Autorais para artigos publicados nesta revista são do autor, com direitos de primeira publicação para a revista. Em virtude de aparecerem nesta revista de acesso público, os artigos são de uso gratuito, com atribuições próprias, em aplicações educacionais e não-comerciais.
