Planificación urbana basada en procesos complejos de toma de decisiones: una revisión del alcance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20435/multi.v30i74.4565Palabras clave:
procesos de toma de decisión, políticas públicas, sistemas de apoyo a decisión, gestión urbanaResumen
Este artículo presenta una idea de investigación interdisciplinar que engloba la teoría de la decisión en el desarrollo de políticas públicas, integrándola como enfoque de apoyo para llevar a cabo procesos de toma de decisiones complejos y conflictivos en el entorno urbano. El objetivo fue analizar, mediante una scoping review, las posibles interacciones entre los sistemas de apoyo a la decisión en los procesos de elaboración de políticas públicas urbanas. La metodología de investigación, predominantemente cualitativa, se basó en un análisis de contenido de los constructos establecidos a partir de nueve artículos científicos. Los resultados sostienen que los sistemas de apoyo a la toma de decisiones pueden contribuir y/o apoyar medidas más precisas, considerando los elementos en el diseño y proceso de las políticas públicas. La conclusión subraya la importancia de la planificación de las políticas públicas, haciendo énfasis en la necesidad de abordar los nuevos retos urbanos con una visión más democrática, sistémica y holística.
Citas
ALBRECHTS, Louis. Strategic planning: ontological and epistemological challenges. In: GUNDER, Michael; MADANIPOUR, Ali; WATSON, Vanessa (Ed.). The Routledge Handbook of Planning Theory. Nova York: Routledge, 2017.
ARKSEY, Hilary; O'MALLEY, Lisa. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International journal of social research methodology, [S. l.], v. 8, n. 1, p. 19-32, 2005.
BARDIN, Lawrence. Análise de conteúdo. Lisboa: edições 70, 2015.
BEAUREGARD, Robert. What theorists do. Urban Geography, [S. l.], v. 33, n. 4, p. 474-487, 2012.
BEAUREGARD, Robert. Positioning urban theory. Antipode, [S. l.], v. 35, n. 5, p. 999-1007, 2003.
BRENNER, Neil; SCHMID, Christian. Towards a new epistemology of the urban? City, v. 19, n. 2-3, p. 151-182, 2015.
CARSTENSEN, Martin; SCHMIDT, Vivien. Power through, over and in ideas: conceptualizing ideational power in discursive institutionalism. Journal of European public policy, [S. l.], v. 23, n. 3, p. 318-337, 2016.
CASTELLS, Manuel. Vers une théorie sociologique de la planification urbaine. Sociologie du travail, Paris, v. 11, n. 4, p. 413-443, 1969.
ENSERINK, Bert; KOPPENJAN, Joop; MAYER, Igor. A policy sciences view on policy analysis. In: THISSEN, Wil; WALKER, Warren (Ed.). Public policy analysis: new developments. Boston: Springer, 2013.
ENSSLIN, Leonardo; MONTIBELLER NETO, Gilberto; NORONHA, Sandro MacDonald. Apoio à decisão: metodologias para estruturação de problemas e avaliação multicritério de alternativas. Santa Catarina: Insular, 2001.
FRANKFORT-NACHMIAS, Chava; NACHMIAS, David. Research Methods in the Social Sciences. 7. ed. Nova York: Worth Publishers, 2007.
GHODSVALI, Maryam; DANE, Gamze; VRIES, Bauke de. An integrated decision support system for the urban food-water-energy nexus: methodology, modification, and model formulation. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, [S. l.], v. 100, p. 101940.
GIL, Antonio Carlos. Métodos e Técnicas de Pesquisa Social. 7. ed. São Paulo: Grupo GEN, 2019.
GUERLAIN, Cindy; RENAULT, Samuel; FERRERO, Francesco; FAYE, Sébastien. Decision support systems for smarter and sustainable logistics of construction sites. Sustainability, [S. l.], v. 11, n. 10, p. 2762, 2019.
HAQBEEN, Jawad; SAHAB, Sofia; ITO, Takayuki; RIZZI, Paola. Using decision support system to enable crowd identify neighborhood issues and its solutions for policy makers: An online experiment at kabul municipal level. Sustainability, [S. l.], v. 13, n. 10, p. 5453, 2021.
HEALEY, Patsy. Planning theory: interaction with Institutional Contexts. In: SMELSER, Niel; BALTES, Paul (Ed.). International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. Oxford: Pergamon, 2001.
HOCH, Charles. Neo-pragmatist planning theory. In: GUNDER, Michael; MADANIPOUR, Ali; WATSON, Vanessa (Ed.). The Routledge Handbook of Planning Theory. Nova York: Routledge, 2017.
KINGDON, John; STANO, Eric. Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. Colchester: TBS The Book Service Ltd, 1984.
KUHN, Thomas Samuel. A estrutura das revoluções científicas. 13. ed. São Paulo: Editora Perspectiva, 2017.
MÄNTYSALO, Raine; BÄCKLUND, Pia. The governance of planning: flexibly networked, yet institutionally grounded. In: GUNDER, Michael; MADANIPOUR, Ali; WATSON, Vanessa (Ed.). The Routledge Handbook of Planning Theory. Nova York: Routledge, 2017.
MELKONYAN, Ani; GRUCHMANN, Tim; LOHMAR, Fabian; BLEISCHWITZ, Raimund. Decision support for sustainable urban mobility: a case study of the Rhine-Ruhr area. Sustainable Cities and Society, [S. l.], v. 80, p. 103806, 2022.
MERCADER-MOYANO, Pilar; CAMPOREALE, Patricia; SERRANO-JIMÉNEZ, Antonio. Integrated urban regeneration for high-rise multi-family buildings by providing a multidimensional assessment model and decision support system. Journal of Building Engineering, [S. l.], v. 76, p. 107359, 2023.
NETO NASCIMENTO, Paulo; MOREIRA, Tomás Antonio; HARDT, Carlos; SCHUSSEL, Zulma. Análise de políticas públicas: entre a modelagem e a realidade da política habitacional brasileira. Revista de Administração Pública, Rio de Janeiro, v. 49, n. 4, p. 847-868, 2015.
PAULY, Dominica Anna Silvia. Ambiguïteit in het spel: de casus PolyVinylChloride. 2001. 346p. Tese (Doutorado em Administração Pública) – Technology, Policy and Management, Eburon, Delft, 2001.
PLUCHINOTTA, Irene; ESPOSITO, Dario; CAMARDA, Domenico. Fuzzy cognitive mapping to support multi-agent decisions in development of urban policymaking. Sustainable Cities and Society, [S. l.], v. 46, p. 101402, 2019.
PULSELLI, Riccardo Maria; MARCHI, Michela; NERI, Elena; MARCHETTINI, Nadia; BASTIANONI, Simone. Carbon accounting framework for decarbonisation of European city neighbourhoods. Journal of cleaner production, [S. l.], v. 208, p. 850-868, 2019.
RICHARDSON, Roberto Jarry. Pesquisa Social: métodos e técnicas. 7. ed. São Paulo: Grupo GEN, 2017.
SCHLAGER, Edella. A comparison of frameworks, theories, and models of policy processes. In: SABATIER, Paul (Ed.). Theories of the Policy Process. 2. ed. Nova York: Routledge, 2019.
SERRANO-JIMÉNEZ, Antonio; BLANDÓN-GONZÁLEZ, Begoña; BARRIOS-PADURA, Ángela. Towards a built environment without physical barriers: An accessibility assessment procedure and action protocol for social housing occupied by the elderly. Sustainable Cities and Society, [S. l.], v. 76, p. 103456, 2022.
SERRANO-JIMÉNEZ, Antonio; DÍAZ-LÓPEZ, Carmen; RAMÍREZ-JUIDIAS, Emilio; BARRIOS-PADURA, Ángela. Multi-criteria assessment model on environmental ergonomics for decision-making in schoolyards based on remote-sensing and GIS resources. Sustainable Cities and Society, [S. l.], v. 92, p. 104481, 2023.
SINGH, Vivek Kumar; SINGH, Prashasti; KARMAKAR, Mousumi; LETA, Jacqueline; MAYR, Philipp. The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: a comparative analysis. Scientometrics, [S. l.], v. 126, p. 5113-5142, 2021.
SORENSEN, André. New institutionalism and planning theory. In: GUNDER, Michael; MADANIPOUR, Ali; WATSON, Vanessa (Ed.). The Routledge Handbook of Planning Theory. Nova York: Routledge, 2017.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2024 Donald Francisco Quintana Sequeira, Tatiana Souto Maior de Oliveira, Denis Alcides Rezende
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Os artigos publicados na Revista Multitemas têm acesso aberto (Open Access) sob a licença Creative Commons Attribution, que permite uso, distribuição e reprodução em qualquer meio, sem restrições desde que o trabalho original seja corretamente citado.
Direitos Autorais para artigos publicados nesta revista são do autor, com direitos de primeira publicação para a revista. Em virtude de aparecerem nesta revista de acesso público, os artigos são de uso gratuito, com atribuições próprias, em aplicações educacionais e não-comerciais.
