Reconversión socioeconómica de territorios post-minería: participación de los grupos de interés en procesos de cierre de minas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20435/inter.v26i1.4458Palabras clave:
minería, impactos sociales, participación, cierre de minasResumen
La actividad minera, especialmente en contextos vulnerables, falla en convertir las ganancias económicas en desarrollo sostenible para el post-minería, intensificando impactos sociales en la desactivación de minas. Se argumenta en esta investigación que un enfoque integrador que involucre a los grupos de interés a través de la participación y el diálogo social se presenta como una alternativa en la comprensión de la trayectoria del territorio y el establecimiento de una gobernanza que se sostenga a largo plazo. El objetivo central del trabajo es sistematizar un conjunto de categorías analíticas orientadas al fortalecimiento de procesos de participación aplicados al proceso de cierre de minas. La estrategia de investigación elegida fue la investigación documental indirecta, en la que se buscan artículos y producciones académicas que sustenten el contenido expuesto. La literatura académica todavía se muestra relativamente incipiente al estudiar los temas relacionados con las cuestiones sociales en procesos de cierre de minas y post-cierre. También se destaca que una participación efectiva solo ocurrirá cuando las comunidades impactadas participen en las discusiones y los procesos de decisión relacionados con el uso presente y futuro de los territorios.
Citas
AGÊNCIA NACIONAL DE MINERAÇÃO. Relatório Maiores Arrecadadores CFEM. Portal ANM, [s.l.], 2021. Available at: https://anm.gov.br. Accessed on: January 11, 2022.
AKBAR, D.; ROLFE, J.; LECHNER, A. M.; EVERINGHAM, J. A.; KINNEAR, S. Workshop processes to generate stakeholder consensus about post-mining land uses: an Australian case study. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, [s.l.], v. 64, n. 2, p. 334–58, 2020. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2020.1764341
BABI, K.; ASSELIN, H.; BENZAAZOUA, M. Stakeholders’ perceptions of sustainable mining in Morocco: a case study of the abandoned Kettara mine. Extractive Industries and Society, [s.l.], v. 3, n. 1, p. 185–92, 2016. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2015.11.007
BAINTON, N.; HOLCOMBE, S. A critical review of the social aspects of mine closure. Resources Policy, [s.l.], v. 59, p. 468–78, Aug. 2018. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2018.08.020
BECKETT, C.; KEELING, A. Rethinking remediation: mine reclamation, environmental justice, and relations of care. Local Environment, [s.l.], v. 24, n. 3, p. 216–30, 2019.
BJELKEVIK, A. G.; BOHLIN, T. E. Mine closure – do we miss the opportunities? In: FOURIE, A., TIBBETT, M.; Sharkuu, A. (Org.). Mine Closure 2021: proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Mine Closure. Ulaanbaatar: QMC Group, 2021. p. 155–72. Doi: https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2152_89
BOWLES, P.; MACPHAIL, F.; TETREAULT, D. Social licence versus procedural justice: Competing narratives of (Il)legitimacy at the San Xavier mine, Mexico. Resources Policy, [s.l.], v. 61, n. Feb., p. 157–65, 2019. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.02.005
CESARE, P.; MAXWELL, P. Mine closure legislation in Indonesia: the role of mineral industry involvement. Natural Resources Forum, Oxford, UK and Boston, USA, v. 27, n. 1, p. 42–52, 2003. Doi: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1477-8947.00039
CHUNG, K. L.; ZHONG, K. A Course in Probability Theory. [s.l.]: Academic Press, 2001.
DEMAJOROVIC, J.; LOPES, J. C.; SANTIAGO, A. L. F. The Samarco dam disaster: a grave challenge to social license to operate discourse. Resources Policy, [s.l.], v. 61, p. 273–82, 2019. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.01.017
EDGETT, R. Toward an ethical framework for advocacy in public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, [s.l.], v. 14, p. 1–26, 2002.
EITER, S.; VIK, M. L. Public participation in landscape planning: effective methods for implementing the European Landscape Convention in Norway. Land Use Policy, [s.l.], v. 44, p. 44–53, 2015. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.11.012
EVERINGHAM, J. A.; ROLFE, J.; LECHNER, A. M.; KINNEAR, S.; AKBAR, D. A proposal for engaging a stakeholder panel in planning post-mining land uses in Australia’s coal-rich tropical savannahs. Land Use Policy, [s.l.], v. 79, 2017, p. 397–406, Dec. 2018. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.08.038
FRASER, J.; XAVIER, A. “Corporate Social Responsibility in the Mining Sector in Canada,” CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance. In: PEREIRA, E. G.; SPENCER, R.; MOSES, J. W. (Org.). Sovereign Wealth Funds, Local Content Policies and CSR. [s.l.]: Springer, 2021. p. 579–600.
HOLLEY, E. A.; MITCHAM, C. The Pebble Mine Dialogue: a case study in public engagement and the social license to operate. Resources Policy, [s.l.], v. 47, p. 18–27, 2016. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2015.11.002
HURST, B.; JOHNSTON, K. A.; LANE, A. B. Engaging for a social licence to operate (SLO). Public Relations Review, [s.l.], v. 46, n. 4, p. 1–32, 2020.
JOHNSTON, K. A. Toward a theory of social engagement. In: JOHNSTON, K. A.; TAYLOR, M. (org.). The Handbook of Communication Engagement. [S.l.]: [s.n.], 2018. p. 19–32.
KIVINEN, S.; VARTIAINEN, K.; KUMPULA, T. People and post-mining environments: PPGIS mapping of landscape values, knowledge needs, and future perspectives in Northern Finland. Land, [s.l.], v. 7, n. 4, 151, 2018. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/land7040151
MANCINI, L.; SALA, S. Social impact assessment in the mining sector: review and comparison of indicators frameworks. Resources Policy, [s.l.], v. 57, p. 98–111, 2018.
MARCONI, M. de A.; LAKATOS, E. M. Fundamentos de metodologia científica. 5. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2003. ISSN 9788522457588.
MERCER-MAPSTONE, L.; RIFKIN, W.; LOUIS, W. R.; MOFFAT, K. Company-community dialogue builds relationships, fairness, and trust leading to social acceptance of Australian mining developments. Journal of Cleaner Production, [s.l.], v. 184, p. 671–77, 2018. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.291
MERCER-MAPSTONE, L.; RIFKIN, W.; MOFFAT, K.; LOUIS, W. Conceptualising the role of dialogue in social licence to operate. Resources Policy, [s.l.], v. 54, p. 137–46, 2017. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2017.09.007
MOFFAT, K.; ZHANG, A. The paths to social licence to operate: an integrative model explaining community acceptance of mining. Resources Policy, [s.l.], v. 39, n. 1, p. 61–70, 2014. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2013.11.003
ODELL, C. J.; SCOBLE, M.; BULLARD, J. R. Improving socio-environmental outcomes at Andean mines. International Journal of Mining, Reclamation and Environment, [s.l.], v. 25, n. 2, p. 133–51, 2011.
PIMENTA, A. A. F.; DEMAJOROVIC, J.; SARAIVA DE SOUZA, M. T.; DE CARVALHO PEDRO, S.; PISANO, V. Social licence to operate model: Critical factors of social acceptance of mining in the Brazilian Amazon. Resources Policy, [s.l.], v. 74, p. 102237, 2021. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESOURPOL.2021.102237
PRNO, J.; SCOTT SLOCOMBE, D. Exploring the origins of “social license to operate” in the mining sector: Perspectives from governance and sustainability theories. Resources Policy, [s.l.], v. 37, n. 3, p. 346–57, 2012. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2012.04.002
RAMAN, S.; MOHR, A. Biofuels and the role of space in sustainable innovation journeys. Journal of Cleaner Production, [s.l.], v. 65, p. 224–33, 2014.
RAUSCHMAYER, F.; RISSE, N. A framework for the selection of participatory approaches for SEA. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, [s.l.], v. 25, n. 6, p. 650–66, 2005.
RICHARDSON, R. J.; PERES, J. A.; WANDERLEY, J. C. V. Pesquisa Social – Métodos e Técnicas. São Paulo: Atlas, 1985.
ROWE, G.; FREWER, L. J. A typology of public engagement mechanisms. Science Technology and Human Values, [s.l.], v. 30, n. 2, p. 251–90, 2005.
VAN ECK, N. J.; WALTMAN, L. Manual for VOSviewer version 1.6.10. [S.l.]: [s.n.], 2019. Available at: https://www.vosviewer.com/download. Accessed on: Jan. 11, 2022.
VIVODA, V.; KEMP, D.; OWEN, J. Regulating the social aspects of mine closure in three Australian states. Journal of Energy and Natural Resources Law, [s.l.], v. 37, n. 4, p. 405–24, 2019. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02646811.2019.1608030
XAVIER, A. M. Socio-Economic Mine Closure (SEMC) framework: a comprehensive approach for addressing the socio-economic challenges of mine closure. [s.l.]: The University of British Columbia, 2013.
XAVIER, A.; VEIGA, M.; ZYL, D. Introduction and Assessment of a Socio-Economic Mine Closure Framework. Journal of Management and Sustainability, [s.l.], v. 5, n. 1, p. p. 38, 2015. Available at: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jms/article/view/43788. Accessed on: 30 Set. 2021.
YIN, R. K. Estudo de caso: planejamento e métodos. 5. ed. [S.l.]: Bookman editora, 2015.
ZHAO, F.; MA, Y.; XI, F.; YANG, L.; SUN, J. Evaluating the sustainability of mine rehabilitation programs in China. Restoration Ecology, [s.l.], v. 28, n. 5, p. 1061–6, 2020. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13183
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2024 Rodrigo Silva Barreto, Jacques Demajorovic, Adriano Augusto França Pimenta
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Direitos Autorais para artigos publicados nesta revista são do autor, com direitos de primeira publicação para a revista. Em virtude de aparecerem nesta revista de acesso público, os artigos são de uso gratuito, com atribuições próprias, em aplicações educacionais e não-comerciais.
