Palavras-chave
impactos sociais
engajamento
fechamento de minas
Como Citar
Resumo
A atividade de mineração, especialmente em contextos vulneráveis, falha em converter ganhos econômicos em desenvolvimento sustentável para o pós-mineração, intensificando impactos sociais na desativação de minas. Argumenta-se, nesta pesquisa, que uma abordagem integrativa, envolvendo os stakeholders por meio do engajamento e do diálogo social, mostra-se como uma alternativa na compreensão da trajetória do território e estabelecimento de uma governança que se sustente no longo prazo. O objetivo central do trabalho é sistematizar um conjunto de categorias analíticas voltadas ao fortalecimento de processos de engajamento aplicadas ao processo de fechamento de minas. A estratégia de pesquisa escolhida foi a pesquisa documental indireta, em que se buscam artigos e produções acadêmicas que sustentem o conteúdo exposto. A literatura acadêmica ainda se mostra relativamente incipiente quando no estudo dos temas relacionados às questões sociais em processos de fechamento de minas e pós-fechamento. Destaca-se também que uma participação efetiva somente ocorrerá quando as comunidades impactadas participarem das discussões e dos processos de decisão relacionados ao uso presente e futuro dos territórios.
Referências
AGÊNCIA NACIONAL DE MINERAÇÃO. Relatório Maiores Arrecadadores CFEM. Portal ANM, [s.l.], 2021. Available at: https://anm.gov.br. Accessed on: January 11, 2022.
AKBAR, D.; ROLFE, J.; LECHNER, A. M.; EVERINGHAM, J. A.; KINNEAR, S. Workshop processes to generate stakeholder consensus about post-mining land uses: an Australian case study. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, [s.l.], v. 64, n. 2, p. 334–58, 2020. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2020.1764341
BABI, K.; ASSELIN, H.; BENZAAZOUA, M. Stakeholders’ perceptions of sustainable mining in Morocco: a case study of the abandoned Kettara mine. Extractive Industries and Society, [s.l.], v. 3, n. 1, p. 185–92, 2016. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2015.11.007
BAINTON, N.; HOLCOMBE, S. A critical review of the social aspects of mine closure. Resources Policy, [s.l.], v. 59, p. 468–78, Aug. 2018. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2018.08.020
BECKETT, C.; KEELING, A. Rethinking remediation: mine reclamation, environmental justice, and relations of care. Local Environment, [s.l.], v. 24, n. 3, p. 216–30, 2019.
BJELKEVIK, A. G.; BOHLIN, T. E. Mine closure – do we miss the opportunities? In: FOURIE, A., TIBBETT, M.; Sharkuu, A. (Org.). Mine Closure 2021: proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Mine Closure. Ulaanbaatar: QMC Group, 2021. p. 155–72. Doi: https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2152_89
BOWLES, P.; MACPHAIL, F.; TETREAULT, D. Social licence versus procedural justice: Competing narratives of (Il)legitimacy at the San Xavier mine, Mexico. Resources Policy, [s.l.], v. 61, n. Feb., p. 157–65, 2019. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.02.005
CESARE, P.; MAXWELL, P. Mine closure legislation in Indonesia: the role of mineral industry involvement. Natural Resources Forum, Oxford, UK and Boston, USA, v. 27, n. 1, p. 42–52, 2003. Doi: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1477-8947.00039
CHUNG, K. L.; ZHONG, K. A Course in Probability Theory. [s.l.]: Academic Press, 2001.
DEMAJOROVIC, J.; LOPES, J. C.; SANTIAGO, A. L. F. The Samarco dam disaster: a grave challenge to social license to operate discourse. Resources Policy, [s.l.], v. 61, p. 273–82, 2019. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.01.017
EDGETT, R. Toward an ethical framework for advocacy in public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, [s.l.], v. 14, p. 1–26, 2002.
EITER, S.; VIK, M. L. Public participation in landscape planning: effective methods for implementing the European Landscape Convention in Norway. Land Use Policy, [s.l.], v. 44, p. 44–53, 2015. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.11.012
EVERINGHAM, J. A.; ROLFE, J.; LECHNER, A. M.; KINNEAR, S.; AKBAR, D. A proposal for engaging a stakeholder panel in planning post-mining land uses in Australia’s coal-rich tropical savannahs. Land Use Policy, [s.l.], v. 79, 2017, p. 397–406, Dec. 2018. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.08.038
FRASER, J.; XAVIER, A. “Corporate Social Responsibility in the Mining Sector in Canada,” CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance. In: PEREIRA, E. G.; SPENCER, R.; MOSES, J. W. (Org.). Sovereign Wealth Funds, Local Content Policies and CSR. [s.l.]: Springer, 2021. p. 579–600.
HOLLEY, E. A.; MITCHAM, C. The Pebble Mine Dialogue: a case study in public engagement and the social license to operate. Resources Policy, [s.l.], v. 47, p. 18–27, 2016. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2015.11.002
HURST, B.; JOHNSTON, K. A.; LANE, A. B. Engaging for a social licence to operate (SLO). Public Relations Review, [s.l.], v. 46, n. 4, p. 1–32, 2020.
JOHNSTON, K. A. Toward a theory of social engagement. In: JOHNSTON, K. A.; TAYLOR, M. (org.). The Handbook of Communication Engagement. [S.l.]: [s.n.], 2018. p. 19–32.
KIVINEN, S.; VARTIAINEN, K.; KUMPULA, T. People and post-mining environments: PPGIS mapping of landscape values, knowledge needs, and future perspectives in Northern Finland. Land, [s.l.], v. 7, n. 4, 151, 2018. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/land7040151
MANCINI, L.; SALA, S. Social impact assessment in the mining sector: review and comparison of indicators frameworks. Resources Policy, [s.l.], v. 57, p. 98–111, 2018.
MARCONI, M. de A.; LAKATOS, E. M. Fundamentos de metodologia científica. 5. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2003. ISSN 9788522457588.
MERCER-MAPSTONE, L.; RIFKIN, W.; LOUIS, W. R.; MOFFAT, K. Company-community dialogue builds relationships, fairness, and trust leading to social acceptance of Australian mining developments. Journal of Cleaner Production, [s.l.], v. 184, p. 671–77, 2018. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.291
MERCER-MAPSTONE, L.; RIFKIN, W.; MOFFAT, K.; LOUIS, W. Conceptualising the role of dialogue in social licence to operate. Resources Policy, [s.l.], v. 54, p. 137–46, 2017. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2017.09.007
MOFFAT, K.; ZHANG, A. The paths to social licence to operate: an integrative model explaining community acceptance of mining. Resources Policy, [s.l.], v. 39, n. 1, p. 61–70, 2014. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2013.11.003
ODELL, C. J.; SCOBLE, M.; BULLARD, J. R. Improving socio-environmental outcomes at Andean mines. International Journal of Mining, Reclamation and Environment, [s.l.], v. 25, n. 2, p. 133–51, 2011.
PIMENTA, A. A. F.; DEMAJOROVIC, J.; SARAIVA DE SOUZA, M. T.; DE CARVALHO PEDRO, S.; PISANO, V. Social licence to operate model: Critical factors of social acceptance of mining in the Brazilian Amazon. Resources Policy, [s.l.], v. 74, p. 102237, 2021. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESOURPOL.2021.102237
PRNO, J.; SCOTT SLOCOMBE, D. Exploring the origins of “social license to operate” in the mining sector: Perspectives from governance and sustainability theories. Resources Policy, [s.l.], v. 37, n. 3, p. 346–57, 2012. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2012.04.002
RAMAN, S.; MOHR, A. Biofuels and the role of space in sustainable innovation journeys. Journal of Cleaner Production, [s.l.], v. 65, p. 224–33, 2014.
RAUSCHMAYER, F.; RISSE, N. A framework for the selection of participatory approaches for SEA. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, [s.l.], v. 25, n. 6, p. 650–66, 2005.
RICHARDSON, R. J.; PERES, J. A.; WANDERLEY, J. C. V. Pesquisa Social – Métodos e Técnicas. São Paulo: Atlas, 1985.
ROWE, G.; FREWER, L. J. A typology of public engagement mechanisms. Science Technology and Human Values, [s.l.], v. 30, n. 2, p. 251–90, 2005.
VAN ECK, N. J.; WALTMAN, L. Manual for VOSviewer version 1.6.10. [S.l.]: [s.n.], 2019. Available at: https://www.vosviewer.com/download. Accessed on: Jan. 11, 2022.
VIVODA, V.; KEMP, D.; OWEN, J. Regulating the social aspects of mine closure in three Australian states. Journal of Energy and Natural Resources Law, [s.l.], v. 37, n. 4, p. 405–24, 2019. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02646811.2019.1608030
XAVIER, A. M. Socio-Economic Mine Closure (SEMC) framework: a comprehensive approach for addressing the socio-economic challenges of mine closure. [s.l.]: The University of British Columbia, 2013.
XAVIER, A.; VEIGA, M.; ZYL, D. Introduction and Assessment of a Socio-Economic Mine Closure Framework. Journal of Management and Sustainability, [s.l.], v. 5, n. 1, p. p. 38, 2015. Available at: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jms/article/view/43788. Accessed on: 30 Set. 2021.
YIN, R. K. Estudo de caso: planejamento e métodos. 5. ed. [S.l.]: Bookman editora, 2015.
ZHAO, F.; MA, Y.; XI, F.; YANG, L.; SUN, J. Evaluating the sustainability of mine rehabilitation programs in China. Restoration Ecology, [s.l.], v. 28, n. 5, p. 1061–6, 2020. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13183
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2024 Rodrigo Silva Barreto, Jacques Demajorovic, Adriano Augusto França Pimenta