Innovation ecosystems and measures aimed at environmental sustainability: Cidade Pedra Branca case study

Resumo

The proposal described herein is aimed at technological innovation, with a focus on product sustainability. The object of this study was six companies from the innovation ecosystem Cidade Pedra Branca, which sought to identify socio-environmental actions that also have the goal of generating significant results in economic terms. We concluded that, in general, the companies in Cidade Pedra Branca are committed to achieving social, environmental, and economic sustainability.

 

Biografia do Autor

Ana Regina Aguiar Dutra, UNISUL
possui graduação em Matemática pela Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (1986), mestrado em Engenharia de Produção pela Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (1990) e doutorado em Engenharia de Produção pela Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (1999). Atualmente é professor titular da Universidade do Sul de Santa Catarina. Tem experiência na área de Engenharia de Produção, com ênfase em Ergonomia, atuando principalmente nos seguintes temas: ergonomia, produtos e processos produtivos sustentáveis e saudáveis e educação. Faz parte do quadro docente do Mestrado em Ciências Ambientais (PPGCA/UNISUL).
Evellyn Sperber Silva, Department of Production Engineering, University of Southern Santa Catarina/ (Unisul), Brazil, Av. Pedra Branca, 25, Palhoça, SC, Brazil, CEP 80137270.
Estudante de Graduação do Curso de Engenharia de Produção - 9a fase. Participou do PIBIC/CNPp e faz estágio na área.
Anelise Leal Vieira Cubas, Enviromental Science Master Program, University of Southern Santa Catarina/ (Unisul), Brazil, Av. Pedra Branca, 25, Palhoça, SC, Brazil, CEP 80137270.
 Possui graduação em Engenharia Química pela Fundação Universidade Regional de Blumenau (1996), mestrado em Engenharia Ambiental pela Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (1999), doutorado e pós-doutorado em Química pela Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (2004). Atualmente é professora do quadro permanente do Mestrado em ciências ambientais (PPGCS), diretora do laboratório de tecnologia a plasma da Universidade do Sul de Santa Catarina e coordenadora do grupo de pesquisa em tecnologias limpas dos processos produtivos (TECLIMP). Tem experiência na área ambiental, com ênfase em gestão de resíduos dos processos produtivos, atuando principalmente nos seguintes temas: plasma térmico e plasma frio, compostos orgânicos voláteis, resíduos perigosos, gestão de resíduos sólidos e reaproveitamento de resíduos dos processos produtivos. Também atua como professora extensionista em projetos voltados ao ensino médio de escolas públicas, atualmente é coordenadora do projeto "Ciência Móvel" que percorre escolas públicas promovendo novas práticas pedagógicas no ensino de ciências exatas e da terra (química, física e matemática) no ensino médio através do desenvolvimento de oficinas com temática ambiental.

http://lattes.cnpq.br/1344283676317407

Referências

ABNT. NBR-ISO 14001 Sistemas da Gestão Ambiental – Requisitos com Orientações para Uso. 2. ed. Rio de Janeiro: ABNT, 2005.

ANGRILL, S.; FARRENY, R.; GASOL, M.C.; GABARRELL, X.; VINOLAS, B.; JOSA, A.; RIERADEVALL, J. Environmental analysis of rainwater harvesting infrastructures in diffuse and compact urban models of Mediterranean climate. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, v. 17, n. 1, p. 25-42, Sept. 2011. Available in: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11367-011-0330-6

ANITYASARI, M.; RACHMAT, A. N. Lesson learnt from top-down selection of medium enterprises for green industry pilot project in Surabaya. Procedia Manufacturing, v. 4, p. 54-61, 2015.

BAAS, L.; HJELM; O. Support your future today: enhancing sustainable transitions by experimenting at academic conferences. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 98, p. 1-7, July 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.059.

BENETTI, A. D. Water reuse: issues, technologies, and applications. Engenharia Sanitária e Ambiental, v. 13, n. 3, p. 247-8, July/Sept. 2008. Available in: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/esa/v13n3/a01v13n3.pdf. Access in: 24 Oct. 2017.

BRASIL. Lei 12.305, de 2 de agosto de 2010. Available in http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2007-2010/2010/lei/l12305.htm. Access in: 24 Oct. 2017.

BRASIL. Ministério do Meio Ambiente. Conselho Nacional do Meio Ambiente. Resolução CONAMA n. 362 de 23 de junho de 2005. 2005. Available in: http://www.mma.gov.br/port/conama/legislacao/CONAMA_RES_CONS_2005_362.pdf. Access in: 24 Oct. 2017.

BROWN, D.; DILLARD, J.; MARSHALL, R. S. Triple bottom line: a business metaphor for a social construct. Documents de Treball. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, v. 6, n. 2, p. 1-36, mar. 2006. Available in: https://www.recercat.cat/bitstream/handle/2072/2223/UABDT06-2.pdf?sequence Access in: 6 Feb. 2019.

CARAYANNIS, E. G.; BARTH, T. D.; CAMPBELL, D. F. J. The Quintuple Helix innovation model: global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, v. 1, n. 2, p. 1-12, 2012.

CHEN, W.; CHEN, J.; XU, D.; LIU, J.; NIU, N. Assessment of the practices and contributions of China's green industry to the socio-economic development. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 153, p. 648-56, June 2017.

COSTANTINI, V.; CRESPI, F.; MARIN, G.; PAGLIALUNGA, E. Eco-innovation, sustainable supply chains and environmental performance in European industries. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 155, part 2, p. 141-54, July 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.038.

DIACONU, M. Technological innovation: concept, process, typology and implications in the economy. Theoretical and Applied Economics, v. XVIII, n. 10(563), p. 127-44, 2011. Available in: http://www.store.ectap.ro/articole/655.pdf. Access in: 6 Feb. 2019.

DIANA, G. C.; JABBOURA, C. J. C.; JABBOURA, A. B. L. S.; KANNAND, D. Putting Environmental technologies into the mainstream: adoption of environmental technologies by medium-sized manufacturing firms in Brazil. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 142, part 4, p. 4011-8, Jan. 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.054.

DUIC, N.; URBANIEC, K.; HUISINGH, D. Components and structures of the pillars of sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 88, p. 1-12, Feb. 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.11.030.

ELKINGTON, J. Cannibals with forks: the triple bottom line of 21st century business. Oxford, UK: Capstone Publishing, 1997.

ETHOS. Indicadores Ethos para Negócios Sustentáveis e Responsáveis. Ciclo 2015/2016. Available in: http://www3.ethos.org.br/conteudo/indicadores/. Access in: 25 June 2017.

ETZKOWITZ, H. Hélice tríplice: universidade-indústria-governo, inovação em ação. Porto Alegre, RS: Edipucrs, 2009.

EVERETT, R.; BOYLE, G.; PEAKE, S.; RAMAGE, J. Energy systems and sustainability: power for a sustainable future. 2. ed. Oxford: Oxford Univerity Press, 2012.

GLOBAL REPORT INITIATIVE (GRI). Quanto vale essa jornada? Available in: https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/Portuquese-Starting-Points-2-G3.1.pdf>. Access in: 2 June 2017.

GOVINDARAJAN, V.; TRIMBLE, C. O outro lado da inovação: a execução como fator crítico de sucesso. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier, 2010. 264p.

GRANDIA, J. Finding the missing link: examining the mediating role of sustainable public procurement behavior. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 124, p. 183-90, June 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.102.

HALLSTEDT, S. I.; THOMPSON, A. W.; LINDAHL, P. Key elements for implementing a strategic sustainability perspective in the product innovation process. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 51, p. 277-88, July 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.01.043

HANSMANN, R.; MIEG, H. A.; FRISCHKNECHT, P. Principal sustainability components: empirical analysis of synergies between the three pillars of sustainability, International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, v. 19, n. 5, p. 451-9, June 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2012.696220.

KAJIKAWA, Y. Research core and framework of sustainability science. Sustain Sci, v. 3, n. 2, p. 215-39, Oct. 2008.

KILKIŞ, S. Sustainability-oriented innovation system analyses of Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, Turkey and Singapore. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 130, p. 235-47, Sept. 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.138.

KIMATU, J. N. Evolution of strategic interactions from the triple to quad helix innovation models for sustainable development in the era of globalization. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, v. 5, n. 6, p. 4-7, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-016 0044-x

LAURIJSEN, J.; MARSIDI, M.; WESTENBROEK, A.; WORRELL, E.; FAAIJ, A. Paper and biomass for energy? The impact of paper recycling on energy and CO2 emissions. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, v. 54, n. 12, p. 1208-18, Oct. 2010. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.03.016.

MAULEÓN, I. Photovoltaic investment roadmaps and sustainable development. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 117, p. 1112-21, Nov. 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.148

MERRILD, H.; DAMGAARD, A.; CHRISTENSEN, T. H. Recycling of paper: accounting of greenhouse gases and global warming contributions. Waste Management & Research, v. 27, n. 8, p. 746-53, 2009. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0734242X09348530.

MERRILD, H.; DAMGAARD, A.; CHRISTENSEN, T. H. Life cycle assessment of waste paper management: the importance of technology data and system boundaries in assessing recycling and incineration. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, v. 52, n. 12, p. 1391-98, Oct. 2008. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2008.08.004.

MONTANYA, E. C.; KEITH, D. W. LEED, energy savings, and carbon abatement: related but not synonymous. Environmental Science and Technology, v. 45, n. 5, p. 1757-8, Feb. 2011.

MORALES-PINZON, T.; ANGRILL, S.; RIERADEVALL, J.; GABARRELL, X.; GASOL, C. M.; JOSA, A. LCM of rainwater harvesting systems in emerging neighborhoods in Colombia. In: FINKBEINER, M.; FINKBEINER, M. (Ed.). Towards life cycle sustainability management. Berlin: Springer, 2011. p. 277-88.

OECD. Oslo Manual: Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data. 3. ed. 2005. 162p. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264013100-en.

OWENSBY-CONTE, D.; YEPES, V. Green buildings: analysis of state of Knowledge. International Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, v. 1, n. 3, p. 27-32, 2012. Available in: http://article.sapub.org/10.5923.j.ijcem.20120103.03.html

REBEHY, P. C. P. W.; COSTA, A. L.; CAMPELLO, C. A. G. B.; ESPINOZA, D. F.; NETO, M. J. Innovative social business of selective waste collection in Brazil: cleaner production and poverty reduction. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 154, p. 462-73, June 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.173.

SANTANA, N. B.; REBELATTO, D. A. N.; PÉRICO, A. E.; MORALLES, H. F.; LEAL FILHO, W. Technological innovation for sustainable development: an analysis of different types of impacts for countries in the BRICS and G7 groups. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, v. 22, n. 5, p. 425-36, ago. 2015 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2015.1069766.

SCHMIDT, J.; HOLM, P.; MERRILD, A.; CHRISTENSEN, P. Life cycle assessment of waste hierarchy-A Danish case study on waste paper. Waste Manage, v. 27, n. 11, p. 1519-30, 2007. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2006.09.004.

SCHOOLMAN, E. D.; GUEST, J. S.; BUSH, K. F.; BELL, A. R. How interdisciplinar is sustainability research? Analyzing the structure of an emerging scientific field. Sustain Sci, v. 7, n. 1, p. 67-80, Jan. 2012.

SCHUMPETER, J. The theory of economic development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1934.

SEVERO, E. A.; GUIMARÃES, J. C. F.; DORIONB, E. C. H. Cleaner production and environmental management as sustainable product innovation antecedents: a survey in Brazilian industries. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 142, part 1, p.87-97, Jan. 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.090.

UPADHYAYA, J. K.; MOORE, G. Sustainability indicators for wastewater reuse systems and their application to two small systems in rural Victoria, Australia. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, v. 39, n. 6, p. 674-88, June 2012.

VOSS, R.; QUAAS, M. F.; SCHMIDT, J. O.; TAHVONEN O.; LINDEGREN, M.; MÖLLMANN, C. Assessing social – ecological trade-offs to advance ecosystem-based fisheries management. PLoS ONE, v. 9, n. 9, p. 1-8, Sept. 2014.

WEBER, G.; CABRAS, I. The transition of Germany's energy production, green economy, low-carbon economy, socio-environmental conflicts, and equitable society. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 167, p. 1222-31, Nov. 2017.

ZHANG, J.; LIU, Y.; CHANG, Y.; ZHANG, L. Industrial eco-efficiency in China: a provincial quantification using three-stage data envelopment analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 143, p. 238-49, Feb. 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.123

Publicado
2019-03-21