Development of a tool to assess the rural sustainability of communities in the French region of Occitania

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20435/multi.v28i68.3933

Keywords:

Rural Sustainability Index, Rural Sustainable Development, Rural Sustainability in Occitanie, Territorial and Rural Balance Pole, Development of Sustainability Index

Abstract

This article presents an analysis of rural sustainability in the Poles of Territorial and Rural Equilibrium (PETR) in Occitania, France, using the Rural Sustainability Index (RSI) as a statistical inference tool. It was constructed based on the dimensions of sustainable development: Social, Economic, Environmental, and Institutional. The methodology used in this research is quali-quantitative, bibliographical, and documental, based on secondary data provided by the French government. The results revealed that by the year 2022, half of the productive communities had a positive performance and half had to optimize efforts towards sustainability, with the best overall performances occurring in the Environmental, Social, and Institutional dimensions, with the Economic dimension showing the greatest potential for improvement. The RSI presents itself as a relevant tool to support the formulation of public policies for rural development, as it allows for reliable comparability between locations, regardless of their economic or population size.

Author Biographies

Leandro Tortosa Sequeira, Universidade Católica Dom Bosco (UCDB)

Doutor em Administração pela Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS). Gestor Socio-Organizacional Rural na Agência de Desenvolvimento Agrário e Extensão Rural de Mato Grosso do Sul (AGRAER). Professor da Universidade Católica Dom Bosco (UCDB).

Leandro Sauer, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS)

Doutor em Engenharia Elétrica pela Universidade Estadual de Campinas (Unicamp). Superintendente de Inteligência de Dados, da Secretaria de Estado de Governo e Gestão Estratégica (SEGOV) de Mato Grosso do Sul. Professor Titular da Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS).  

Fabio Martins Ayres, Universidade Estadual de Mato Grosso do Sul (UEMS)

Doutor em Meio Ambiente e Desenvolvimento Regional pela Uniderp. Professor da Universidade Estadual de Mato Grosso do Sul (UEMS).

References

BECKER, William; SAISANA, Michaela; PAOLO, Paruolo; VANDECASTEELE, Ine. Weights and importance in composite indicators: Closing the gap. Ecological Indicators, Amsterdam, v. 80, p. 12-22, 2017. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.03.056.

BÉNÉ, Christophe; PRAGER, Steven; ACHICANOY, Harold; TORO, Patricia Alvarez; LAMOTTE, Lea; BONILLA, Camila; MAPES, Brendan. Global map and indicators of food system sustainability. Scientific Data, London, v. 6, 2019. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-019-0301-5

BOGGIA, Antonio. CORTINA, Carla. Measuring sustainable development using a multi-criteria model: a case study. Journal of environmental management, Amsterdam, v. 91, n. 11, 2010. Doi : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.06.009

CONSEIL NATIONAL DE L’INFORMATION STATISTIQUE [CNIS]. The French version of the Sustainable Development Goals Indicators. Rapport. CNIS, [s.l.], n. 152, June 2018.

CRESWELL, John. Pesquisa de métodos mistos. 2. ed. Porto Alegre: Penso, 2013.

PAPADIMITROU, Eleni; NEVES, Ana Rita; BECKER, William. JRC statistical audit of the Sustainable Development Goals index and dashboards. Brussels: European Comission, 2019.

HAIR, Joseph F. BLACK, William; BABIN, Barry; ANDERSON, Rolph; TATHAM, Ronald. Análise Multivariada de Dados. 6. ed. Porto Alegre: Bookman, 2009.

LAKATOS, Eva Maria; MARCONI, Maria de Andrade. Sociologia Geral. 8. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2019.

ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC COOPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT [OECD]. OECD Key environmental indicators. Paris: OECD, 2004.

PEREIRA, Marlos da Silva; SAUER, Leandro; FAGUNDES, Mayra Batista Bitencourt. Mensurando a sustentabilidade ambiental: uma proposta de índice para o Mato Grosso do Sul. Interações, Campo Grande, v. 17, n. 2, abr./jun. 2016. Doi: https://doi.org/10.20435/1984042X2016215.

PICTOSTAT. Indicateurs: cartes, donnés et graphiques. Cartographie statistique interministérielle en Occitanie. PICTOSTAT [online], [s.l.], 2022.

RICHARDSON, Roberto Jarry. Pesquisa social: métodos e técnicas. 4. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2017.

SCHMIDT-TRAUB, Guido; KROLL, Christian; TEKSOZ, Katerina; DURAND-DELACRE, David; SACHS, Jeffrey. National baselines for the Sustainable Development Goals assessed in the SDG Index and Dashboards. Nature Geoscience, London, v. 10, p. 547-55, 2017. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2985

SCHULTINK, Gerhardus. Critical environmental indicators: performance indexes and assessment models for sustainable rural development planning. Ecological Modelling, Amsterdam, v. 130, v. 1/3, p. 47-58. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3800(00)00212-X

SUSTAINABLE CITIES INSTITUTE [SCI]. IDSC – BR índice de desenvolvimento sustentável das cidades – Brasil a evolução das 5.570 cidades brasileiras em direção a agenda 2030 da onu. Índice de Desenvolvimento Sustentável das Cidades (IDSC) [online], [s.l.], 2021. Disponível em: https://idsc.cidadessustentaveis.org.br/. Acesso em: 12 out. 2022.

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE ON PROBLEMS OF THE ENVIRONMENT. Indicators of sustainability: reliable tools for decision making. New York: UN, 2006.

SUSTAINABLE CITIES INSTITUTE [SCI]. IDSC – BR Índice de Desenvolvimento Sustentável das Cidades – Brasil: a evolução das 5.570 cidades brasileiras em direção a agenda 2030 da ONU. SCI [online], Eugene, 2021.

UNITED NATIONS [UN]. Indicators and a monitoring framework for the Sustainable Development Goals. Launching a data revolution. New York: Sustainable Development Solutions Network, 2015.

UNITED NATIONS [UN]. Indicators of sustainable development: guidelines and methodologies. 3. ed. New York: UN, 2007.

UNITED NATIONS [UN]. Indicators of sustainable development: framework and methodologies. New York: UN, 2001.

Downloads

Published

2023-05-16

How to Cite

Sequeira, L. T., Sauer, L., & Ayres, F. M. (2023). Development of a tool to assess the rural sustainability of communities in the French region of Occitania. Multitemas, 28(68), 163–187. https://doi.org/10.20435/multi.v28i68.3933