Rights, capabilities and urban space: an approach to housing policies and local development
PDF (Português (Brasil))

Keywords

right to housing
Capability Approach
substantive freedoms
local development
public policies

How to Cite

LUTZER, Anderson; MUELLER, Airton Adelar. Rights, capabilities and urban space: an approach to housing policies and local development. Interações , Campo Grande, v. 27, n. 1, p. e274919, 2026. DOI: 10.20435/inter.v27i1.4919. Disponível em: https://interacoes.ucdb.br/interacoes/article/view/4919. Acesso em: 15 oct. 2026.

Abstract

This article addresses the right to housing from the perspective of local development, articulating human rights theories with the Capabilities Approach, formulated by Amartya Sen and Martha Nussbaum. The study aims to investigate to what extent this theoretical perspective allows us to overcome both the limitations arising from the abstraction of natural rights and the restrictions inherent in legal positivism, in order to offer guidelines for the formulation of housing policies. Methodologically, this is a qualitative theoretical essay, based on the assumptions of Francis Meneghetti and critical hermeneutics, developed through bibliographic review and cross-sectional analysis of theoretical frameworks on the production of urban space. The results indicate that housing should be understood as a capability that transcends the notion of a commodity, requiring the management of urban conversion factors and the prevalence of the use value of land over its exchange value. It concludes that overcoming housing vulnerability requires the adoption of strategies capable of ensuring the legal enforceability of the right to housing and promoting the exercise of citizenship in collective urban space.

https://doi.org/10.20435/inter.v27i1.4919
PDF (Português (Brasil))

References

ADORNO, T. W. O ensaio como forma. In: COHN, G. (Org.). Theodor W. Adorno: sociologia. São Paulo: Ática, 1986.

ARENDT, H. A condição humana. Tradução: Roberto Raposo. 11. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Forense Universitária, 2010.

BERLIN, I. Quatro ensaios sobre a liberdade. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1969.

BOAVA, D. L. T.; MACEDO, F. M. F.; SETTE, R. S. Contribuições do ensaio teórico para os estudos organizacionais. Revista Administração em Diálogo – RAD, São Paulo, v. 22, n. 2, p. 69-90, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23925/2178-0080.2020v22i2.41951

BRASIL. [Constituição (1988)]. Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil de 1988. Brasília, DF: Presidente da República; Senado Federal, 1988.

GIL, A. C. Como elaborar projetos de pesquisa. 7. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2022.

HARVEY, D. Cidades rebeldes: do direito à cidade à revolução urbana. São Paulo: Boitempo, 2014.

HARVEY, D. O direito à cidade. Lutas Sociais, São Paulo, n. 29, p. 73-89, 2012.

IPEA. Políticas sociais: acompanhamento e análise. Vinte anos da Constituição Federal. [17, volume 1]. 2. ed. Brasília, DF: IPEA, 2009.

KENNA, P.; UHRY, M. How the right to housing became justiciable in France. Brussels: FEANTSA, 2006.

MARSHALL, T. H. Citizenship and social class. In: MARSHALL, T. H. Class, citizenship and social development: essays. New York: Doubleday and Company, 1964.

MCLACHLIN, H. V. Justice, rights and health care: A discussion of the report of the Commission on Social Justice. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, Bingley, v. 18, n. 11/12, p. 78-97, 1998.

MENEGHETTI, F. K. O que é um ensaio-teórico? Revista de Administração Contemporânea, Maringá, v. 15, n. 2, p. 320-332, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-65552011000200010

NORMAN, R. The moral philosophers: an introduction to ethics. 2. ed. Oxford: University Press, 1998.

NUSSBAUM, M. C. Capabilities, entitlements, rights: supplementation and critique. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, London, v. 12, n. 1, p. 23-37, 2011a. DOI: 10.1080/19452829.2011.541731

NUSSBAUM, M. C. Creating Capabilities: the human development approach. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2011b.

NUSSBAUM, M. C. Women and human development: the capabilities approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.

NUSSBAUM, M. C. Human functioning and social justice: In defense of Aristotelian essentialism. Political Theory, Thousand Oaks, v. 20, n. 2, p. 202-246, 1992. DOI: 10.1177/0090591792020002002

OLIVEIRA, L. Y. Q.; FERREIRA, J. S. W.; MATTOS, F. C. A produção do espaço urbano na sociedade brasileira: disputas e alianças na política habitacional. Interações, Campo Grande, MS, v. 26, n. 2, e264547, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20435/inter.v26i1.4547

ONU. Declaração Universal dos Direitos Humanos. Paris: Assembleia Geral das Nações Unidas, 1948. Disponível em: https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights. Acesso em: 25 maio 2026.

PACHECO, F. P.; BOMFIM, Z. A. C. Observações sobre a relação pessoa-ambiente na construção de um Plano Integrado de Regularização Fundiária. Interações, Campo Grande, MS, v. 26, n. 2, e264441, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20435/inter.v26i1.4441

PNUD. Human development report 2000: human rights and human development. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.

RAWLS, J. Uma teoria da justiça. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1971.

SCRUTON, R. A political philosophy: arguments for conservatism. London: Continuum, 2006.

SEN, A. Human rights and capabilities. Journal of Human Development, London, v. 6, n. 2, p. 151-166, 2005. DOI: 10.1080/14649880500120491

SEN, A. Rights and agency. Philosophy & Public Affairs, Princeton, v. 11, n. 1, p. 3-39, 1982.

SEVERINO, A. J. Metodologia do trabalho científico. 24. ed. São Paulo: Cortez, 2016.

TURNER, B. Outline of a theory of human rights. Sociology, Thousand Oaks, v. 27, n. 3, p. 489-512, 1993.

WALDRON, J. Homelessness and the issue of freedom. In: WALDRON, J. Liberal rights: collected papers. Cambridge: University Press, 1993.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 Anderson Lutzer, Airton Adelar Mueller