Actors networks in the Bioceanic Road Corridor “Mato Grosso do Sul – Ports of Northern Chile”: diagnosis and proposal for a multilevel governance

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20435/inter.v24i4.4180

Keywords:

Bioceanic Road Corridor, governance, South America, infrastructures integration

Abstract

The Bi-Oceanic Road Corridor connecting Brazil, Paraguay, Argentina, and Chile is a project aimed,
among other objectives, at providing new development opportunities to peripheral regions in the Tropic of
Capricorn. However, regional transformation requires more than just physical infrastructure; it particularly
necessitates effective coordination among diverse actors to achieve development. The main objective of
this document is to provide a detailed explanation of the actor network structure within the Bi-Oceanic
Highway Corridor and propose a potential governance approach that facilitates improved coordination
among participants. Through Social Network Analysis (SNA), we conducted an exploration of the participation
dynamics and decision-making among the different actors involved. Our primary findings reveal a low level of
private sector engagement, limited transnational links (with more interactions occurring among actors from
the same country), scarce connections between national and subnational/local government actors, as well
as minimal involvement of the national government in Argentina. Regarding the governance proposal, we
suggest the creation of two new committees (Social and Environmental Development, and Border Security),
the promotion of business missions with a regional integration approach, and the preservation of the progress
made by the CVB Working Group.

Author Biographies

Ledys Franco, Universidad Católica del Norte de Chile (UCN)

Master en Economía Aplicada con Mención en Estudios Regionales de la Universidad Católica del Norte, Chile. Investigadora del Instituto de Economía Aplicada Regional de la Universidad Católica del Norte de Chile (IDEAR/UCN).

Julia De Souza Borba Gonçalves, Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada (IPEA)

Investigadora en el Instituto de Investigación Económica Aplicada (IPEA, Brasil). Estudiante de doctorado en Relaciones Internacionales por la Universidad de Brasilia (UnB) y master en Relaciones Internacionales por el Programa Interinstitucional (UNESP, UNICAMP y PUC-SP) de Postgrado en Relaciones Internacionales San Tiago Dantas.

Miguel Atienza, Universidad Católica del Norte de Chile (UCN)

Doctor en Economía de la Universidad Autónoma de Madrid y MPhil en Estudios de Desarrollo del Institute of Development Studies (IDS), Universidad de Sussex. Académico del Departamento de Economía de la Universidad Católica del Norte en Antofagasta (Chile). Especializado en economía regional y urbana y sus principales temas de investigación son la evolución de las concentraciones espaciales, el emprendimiento y el desarrollo regional, el desarrollo de regiones ricas en recursos naturales y la interacción entre multinacionales y regiones.

Pedro Silva Barros, Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada (IPEA)

Pedro Silva Barros es investigador del Instituto de Investigación Económica Aplicada (IPEA, Brasil), doctor en Integración Latinoamericana por la Universidad de São Paulo (USP) y exdirector de asuntos económicos de la Unión de Naciones Suramericanas (Unasur, 2015-2018).

References

ACTA DECLARACIÓN DE ASUNCIÓN SOBRE CORREDORES BIOCEÁNICOS. Assunción, Paraguay, 2015.

ACTA DECLARACIÓN DE BRASILIA SOBRE CORREDORES BIOCEÁNICOS. Brasília, DF, Brasil, 2017.

BARROS, P. S; GONÇALVES, J. S. B. O protagonismo do Mato Grosso do Sul para a resiliência do Corredor

Rodoviário Bioceânico. Monções: Revista de Relações Internacionais da UFGD, v. 10, n. 19, p. 105-28, 2021.

BRASIL. Ministério das Relações Exteriores. Nota a la prensa n. 217. Consenso de Brasilia. Brasília, DF,

maio 2023.

COMISIÓN ECONÓMICA PARA AMÉRICA Y EL CARIBE [CEPAL]. Integración regional: hacia una estrategia de

cadenas de valor inclusivas. [s.l.]: CEPAL, 2014. Disponível em: https://www.cepal.org/pt-br/node/24749.

Acesso em: 10 jun. 2023.

COPUS, A. K.; DE LIMA, P. Territorial cohesion in rural Europe. [s.l.]: Routledge, Taylor y Francisc Group, 2015.

DANNENBERG, P.; DIEZ, J. R.; SCHILLER, D. Spaces for integration or a divide? New-generation growth corridors

and their integration in global value chains in the Global South. Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsgeographie,

[s.l.], v. 62, n. 2, p. 135-51, 2018.

GOBIERNO DE SALTA. Tercer Foro de los Territorios Subnacionales del Corredor Bioceánico de Capricornio:

Declaración De Salta. Salta, 2023. Disponível em: https://www.semadesc.ms.gov.br/wp-content/

uploads/2023/04/Declaracion-de-Salta-Tercer-Foro-de-los-Territorios-Subancionales-el-CBC.pdf. Acesso

em: 10 jun. 2023.

DUNFORD, M.; LIU, W. Chinese perspectives on the Belt and Road Initiative. Cambridge Journal of Regions,

Economy and Society, [s.l.], v. 12, n. 1, p. 145-167, 2019.

FRANCO, L.; GONÇALVES, J. D. S. B.; ATIENZA, M.; BARROS, P. S. Redes de actores y su rol en el desarrollo

de corredores: diagnóstico y propuesta de gobernanza para el corredor bioceánico vial Mato Grosso do

Sul – puertos del norte de Chile. Brasília: Ipea, 2023. 79 p.

GRAPPI, G. Asia’s era of infrastructure and the politics of corridors: decoding the language of logistical

governance. Logistical Asia: The labour of making a world region, 2018. p. 175-98.

HOPE, A.; COX, J. Development corridors. Coffey International Development, [s.l.], n. 12, 2015.

HOWLETT, M., KEKEZ, A.; POOCHAROEN, O. O. Understanding co-production as a policy tool: Integrating

new public governance and comparative policy theory. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research

and Practice, v. 19, n. 5, p. 487-501, 2017.

KUNAKA, C.; CARRUTHERS, R. Trade and transport corridor management toolkit. [s.l.]: World Bank

Publications, 2014.

MAGENNIS, E.; CORRIGAN, J.; BLAIR, N.; BROIN, D. Ó. Planning a Dublin-Belfast Economic Corridor:

Networks, engagement and creating opportunities. Administration, [s.l.], v. 69, n. 4, p. 57-82, 2021.

ÖBERG, M. Governance structure for transport corridors. Dissertation (Doctoral) – Luleå Tekniska

Universitet, 2014.

SANGUINETTI, P.; MONCARZ, P.; VAILLANT, A, ALLUB, L.; JUNCOSA, F.; BARRIL, D.; CONT, W.; Y LALANNE, Á.

Caminos para la integración: facilitación del comercio, infraestructura y cadenas globales. de valor, 2021

SCOTT, J. W. European and North American contexts for cross-border regionalism. Regional studies, v.

, n. 7, p. 605-17. 1999.

SEQUEIRA, S.; HARTMANN, O.; KUNAKA, C. Reviving trade routes: evidence from the maputo corridor.

Sub-Saharan Africa Transport Policy Program (SSATP) discussion paper, n. 14. World Bank, 2014.

TIRONI, L. F. Harmonização de regulamentos e normas técnicas no mercosul. Revista Tempo do Mundo,

[s.l.], n. 23, p. 235–53, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.38116/rtm23art9

VIRGA, T.; MIRANDA, H.; DE MARCHI, B. Integração física na Amazônia sul-americana: a inclusão das

órbitas de circulação intrarregionais na agenda pública. Revista Tempo Do Mundo, [s.l.], v. 27, p. 215-46,

DOI: https://doi.org/10.38116/rtm27art8

Published

2023-11-08

How to Cite

Franco, L., Gonçalves, J. D. S. B., Atienza, M., & Barros, P. S. (2023). Actors networks in the Bioceanic Road Corridor “Mato Grosso do Sul – Ports of Northern Chile”: diagnosis and proposal for a multilevel governance. Interações (Campo Grande), 24(4), e2444180. https://doi.org/10.20435/inter.v24i4.4180

Issue

Section

DOSSIÊ III: O PAPEL DA UNIRILA NOS "DESAFIOS DA INTEGRAÇÃO NA ROTA BIOCEÂNICA (BRASIL, PARAGUAI, ARGENTINA E CHILE)"