Partnership, empowerment and local development

Autores

  • Mário Vasconcellos
  • Ana Maria Vasconcellos

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20435/interações.v10i2.385

Palavras-chave:

Partnership. Empowerment. Local Development.

Resumo

This paper tries to understand how partnership between local organisations (associations, cooperatives,worker’s unions and others) and Government affects local development. It explores to what extent partnership is aneffective strategy for local development in areas of historical conflict between local Government and the localorganisations that defend the interests of family-based, small-scale rural producers. Particularly, this paper concentrateson debate of partnership as a mechanism of power sharing and empowerment of the people that historically have beenexcluded from the development process. Empirically, the paper is based on data collected in the municípios of Ourémand Igarapé-Miri, Northeast of Para State, Amazonia, Brazil.

Referências

AHMAD, M. M. The partnership between international NGOs (Non-Governmental Organisations) and Local NGOs in Bangladesh. Journal of International Development, n. 18. p. 629-638, 2006.

BASA. Relatório de Gestão do FNO 2002. Belém: Banco da Amazônia S.A., 2002. Available: . Aaccess to: 20 may 2005.

BOVAIRD, T. and LOEFFLER, E. Communities, trust, and organisational responses to local governance failure. In: WATSON, S. and Moran A. (orgs.). Trust, Risk and Uncertainty. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.

BOWYER, T.J. Popular participation and the State: democratising the health sector in rural Peru. PhD Thesis. London: University of London, 2003.

BRETT, E.A. Voluntary agencies as development organisations: theorising the problem of efficiency and accountability. Development and Change, n. 24 (2). p. 264- 303, 1993.

CARROLL, T.F. Intermediary NGOs: the supporting link in grassroots development. West Hartford: Kumarian Press, 1992.

CHAMBERS, R. Ideas for Development. London: Earthscan, 2005.

______. Rural Development: putting the last first. London: Longman, 1983.

______. Whose reality counts? Putting the first last. London: IT Publications, 1997.

CLARK, J. Democratizing development: the role of voluntary organizations. West Hartford: Kumarian Press, 1991.

CLEAVER, F. Institutions, agency and the limitations of participatory approaches to development. In:

COOKE, B. and KOTHARI, U. (orgs.). Participation: the new tyranny? London: Zed Books, 2001.

COOKE, B. and KOTHARI, U. Participation: the new tyranny. London: Zed Books, 2001.

CORNWALL, A. and GAVENTA, J. Participation in Governance. In: Huque, A. S. and Zafarullah, H. (orgs.) International Development Governance. London: Taylor & Francis, 2006.

CORNWALL, A. New democratic spaces? The politics of institutionalised participation. IDS Bulletin n. 35 (2). p. 1- 10, 2004.

CORNWALL, A. Beneficiary, consumer, citizen: perspective on participation for poverty reduction. stockholm: Sida, 2001.

DFID. Decentralisation and Governance. Policy Planning and Implementation. London: DFID, 2002. Available: . Access to: 21 dec. 2005.

DIARIO DO PARA. Igarapé-Miri, a capital mundial do açaí Belém: Diário do Pará, 2005. Available: . Access to: 14 dec. 2005.

DOLNY, H. Building trust and co-operation: transforming the Land Bank. In: ROBINSON, D., HEWITT, T. and HARRISS, J. (orgs.) Managing Development: understanding inter-organizational relationships. London: Sage & The Open University, 2000.

EDWARDS, M. and SEN, G. NGOs, Social Change and the Transformation of Human Relationships: a 21s t century civic agenda. In: EDWARDS, M. and FOWLER, A. (orgs.). The Earthscan Reader on NGO Management. London: Earthscan, 2002.

EMMI, M. A oligarquia do Tocantins e o domínio dos Castanhais. Belém: UFPA/NAEA, 1999.

ESCOBAR, A. Discourse and Power in Development: Michael Foulcalt and the relevance of his work to the Third World. In: JACOBSON, T. and SERVAES, J. (orgs.). Theoretical Approaches to Participatory Communication. New Jersey: Hampton Press p. 309-335, 1999.

EVANS, P. Government action, social capital and development: reviewing the evidence on synergy. In:

EVANS, P. (org.) State-society Synergy: government and social capital in development. Berkeley: University of California, 1997.

FARRINGTON, J. and BEBBINGTON, A. Reluctant partners?: non-governmental organizations, the state and sustainable agricultural development. London: Routledge, 1993.

FERREIRA, S. Public-Private Partnership in Angola: the case of development workshop and the water company. MsC. Thesis. Swansea: University of Wales Swansea, 2003.

FLORISBELO, G.R. and GUIJT, I. Participatory municipal development plans in Brazil: divergent partners constructing common futures. In: HICKEY, S. and MOHAN, G. (orgs.). Participation: from tyranny to transformation? Exploring new approaches to participation in development. London: Zed Books, 2004.

FOWLER, A. Striking a balance: a guide to enhancing the effectiveness of non-governmental organisations in international development. London: Earthscan, 1997.

FOWLER, A. Authentic NGDO Partnerships in the new policy agenda for international AID: dead end or light ahead. Development and Change n. 28(1), p. 137-159, 1998.

FRANCIS, P. Participatory development at the World Bank: the primacy of process. In: COOKE, B. And KOTHARI, U. (orgs.) Participation: the new tyranny? London: Zed Books, 2001.

FRIEDMANN, J. Empowerment: the politics of alternative development. Oxford: Blackwell, 1992.

GIDDENS, A. Structuration theory and sociological analysis. In: CLARK, J., MODGIL, C. and MODGIL, S. (orgs.) Anthony Giddens: consensus and controversy. London: Falmer Press, 1990.

GIDDENS, A. Modernity and Self-identity. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1991.

GRZYBOWSKI, C. Caminhos e descaminhos dos movimentos sociais no campo. Petrópolis: Vozes, 1987.

HAILEY, J. Beyond the formulaic: process and practice in South Asian NGOs. In: COOKE, B. and KOTHARI, U. (orgs.) Participation: the new tyranny? London: Zed Books, 2001.

HARRISS, J. Working together: the principles and practice of co-operation. In: ROBINSON, D., HEWITT, T. and HARRISS, J. (orgs.). Managing Development: understanding inter-organizational relationships. London: Sage and The Open University, 2000.

HILDYARD, N., HEGDE, P. et al. Pluralism, participation and power: joint forest management in India. In: COOKE, B. and KOTHARI, U. (eds.). Participation: the new tyranny? London: Zed Books, HODGETT, S. and JOHNSON, D. Troubles, Partnerships and Possibilities: a study of the making Belfast work development initiative in Northern Ireland. Publi c Administration and Development, n. 21, p. 321-332, 2001.

IBAM Avaliação do Programa Nacional de Fortalecimento da Agricultura Familiar (PRONAF) no Estado do Pará. Belém: IBAM, s/d. IBGE. Censo Agropecuário de 1996. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE, 1996.

JOHNSON, H. and WILSON, G. North-South / South- North Partnerships: closing the mutuality gap. Public Administration and Development, n. 26, p. 71-80, 2006.

KOHL, B. Democratizing decentralization in Bolivia: the law of popular participation. J. Plan. Educ. Res. n. 23. p. 153-164, 2003.

LAN, W.F. Institutional design of public agencies and coproduction: a study of irrigation associations in Taiwan. In: EVANS, P. (org.) State-society Synergy: government and social capital in development . Berkeley: University of California, 1997.

LEWIS, D. Building ‘active’ partnership in aid-recipient countries: lessons from a rural development project in Bangladesh. In: OSBORNE, S. P. (org.). Public-Private Partnerships: theory and practice in international perspective. London: Routledge, 2000.

LEWIS, D.J. Partnership as process: building an institutional ethnography of an inter-agency aquaculture project in Bangladesh. In: MOSSE, D., FARRINGTON, J. and REW, A. (orgs.). Development as process: concepts and methods for working with complexity. London: Routledge, 1998.

LISTER, S. Power in partnership? an analysis of an NGO’s relationships with its partners. Journal of International Development, n. 12(2), p. 219-225, 2000.

LOVAN, W.R., MURRAY, M. et al., (orgs.). Participatory Governance: planning, conflict mediation and public decision-making in civil society. Hants: Ashgate, 2004.

MAYOUX, L. Participatory programme learning for women’s empowerment in micro-finance programmes: negotiating complexity, conflict and change. OAKLEY, P. Evaluating empowerment: reviewing the concept and practice. Oxford: INTRAC, 2001.

McQUAID, R.W. The theory of partnership: why have partnerships? In: Osborne, S. P. (ed.) Public-Private Partnerships: theory and practice in international perspective. London: Routledge, 2000.

MIRANDA, H.R.de. Diagnóstico participativo: a experiência de Igarapé-Miri. Belém: UEPA and POEMAR, 2001.

MORAN, A. Trust and Uncertainty in a Settler Society: relations between settlers and aborigines in Australia. In: MORAN, A. and WATSON, S. (orgs.). Trust, Risk and Uncertainty. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.

NELSON, N. and WRIGHT, S. Power and participatory development: theory and practice. London: Intermediate Technology Publications, 1995.

OSTROM, E. Crossing the great divide: co-production, synergy and Development. In EVANS, P. (org.) Statesociety development. Berkeley: University of California, 1997.

PENROSE, A. Partnership. In: ROBINSON, D.; HEWITT, T. and HARRISS, J. (orgs.). Managing Development: understanding inter-organizational relationships. London: Sage and The Open University, 2000.

POSTMA, W. NGO partnership and institutional development: making it real, making it intentional. Canadian Journal of African Studies, n. 28(3), p. 447-471, 1994.

SEBRAE/UNAMA. Diagnóstico sócio-econômico do município de Ourém. Diagnóstico sócio-econômico de 36 municípios paraenses. Belém: SEBRAE/UNAMA, 2002.

SEGEBART, D. Monitoramento participativo de planos municipais de desenvolvimento rural sustentável (PMDRS): uma análise preliminar de experiências feitas pelo projeto PRORENDA RURAL Pará em três municípios do Nordeste paraense. In: TRUSEN, C. And PINHEIRO, M. R. B. Planejando o desenvolvimento local: conceitos metodologias e experiências. Belém: PRORENDA RURAL, 2002.

SEN, A. Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.

TAYLOR, H. Insights into participation from critical management and labour process perspectives. In: COOKE, B. and KOTHARI, U. (orgs.). Participation: the new tyranny? London: Zed Books, 2001.

TEMBO, F. Participation, negotiation and poverty: encountering the power of images: designing pro-poor development programmes. Reading: Ashgate, 2003.

TENDLER, J. Good Governance in the tropics. Baltimore: John Hopkins, 1997.

THOMPSON, S. Trust. Risk and Identity. In: WATSON, S. and MORAN A. (orgs.). Trust, Risk and Uncertainty. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.

TURA, L.R. Atores sociais e suporte institucional dos projetos do FNO-Especial. In: TURA, L.R. and COSTA, F.de A. Campesinato e Estado na Amazônia. Brasília, Brasília Juridica and FASE, p. 271-322, 2000b.

VASCONCELLOS, A.M. and VASCONCELLOS SOBRINHO, M. Alternativas de desenvolvimento e o modelo de sustentabilidade: um estudo de caso das organizações locais dos municípios de Barcerena e Igarapé-Miri. Belém: UNAMA/FIDESA, 2007.

World Bank . State-Society Synergy for Accountability. Washington: World Bank, 2004.

Downloads

Publicado

2016-02-16

Como Citar

Vasconcellos, M., & Vasconcellos, A. M. (2016). Partnership, empowerment and local development. Interações (Campo Grande), 10(2). https://doi.org/10.20435/interações.v10i2.385

Edição

INTERAÇÕES V. 10, N. 2, Jul./Dez. 2009

Seção

Artigos

Licença

Direitos Autorais para artigos publicados nesta revista são do autor, com direitos de primeira publicação para a revista. Em virtude de aparecerem nesta revista de acesso público, os artigos são de uso gratuito, com atribuições próprias, em aplicações educacionais e não-comerciais.