Proposta de uma matriz de correspondência entre indicadores de incertezas do ambiente organizacional e da governança relacional em redes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20435/inter.v0i0.1703Palavras-chave:
redes, governança relacional, incertezas ambientais organizacionais.Resumo
Investiga-se a proposição de correspondência entre as incertezas do ambiente organizacional e a construção social da governança relacional, definindo-se governança relacional como mecanismos de controle e defesa contra as incertezas. Foram investigadas duas redes de Cuiabá, e os dados sustentaram a proposição. Os benefícios teóricos e metodológicos são apresentar uma matriz operacional de pesquisa com um quadro de indicadores confiáveis, e o benefício gerencial é apontar distintas formas de gestão nos dois casos.Referências
BARDIN, L. Análise de conteúdo. São Paulo: Edição 70, 2011.
BERTOLI, N. A confiança e o comprometimento como eixos organizadores dos estados de redes: proposta, argumentação e estudo de casos do agronegócio da região Norte do Paraná. 2015. Dissertação (Mestrado em Administração) - Universidade Paulista (UNIP), São Paulo, 2015.
CAO, Z.; LUMINEAU, F. Revisiting the interplay between contractual and relational governance: a qualitative and meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Operations Management, v. 33-34, p. 15-42, 2015.
CARPENTER, M.; FREDERICKSON, J. Top management teams, global strategic posture, and the moderating role of uncertainty. Academy of Management Journal, v. 44, n. 3, p. 533-45, 2001.
FOSTER, P.; BORGATTI, S.; JONES, C. Gatekeeper search and selection strategies: relational and network governance in a cultural market. Poetics, v. 39, n. 4, p. 247-65, 2011.
GARDELIN, J.; ROSSETO, C.; VERDINELLI, M. O relacionamento entre a incerteza ambiental e o comportamento estratégico na percepção dos gestores de pequenas empresas. Revista de Administração, São Paulo, v. 48, n. 4, p. 702-15, out./dez. 2013.
GEERSBRO, J.; RITTER, T. External performance barriers in business networks: uncertainty, ambiguity, and conflict. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, v. 25, n. 3, p. 196-201, 2010.
GOO, J.; HUANG, C. Facilitating relational governance through service level agreements in IT outsourcing: an application of the commitment-trust theory. Decision Support Systems, v. 46, n. 1, p. 216-32, 2008.
GRANDORI, A. Innovation, uncertainty and relational governance. Industry and Innovation, v. 13, n. 2, p. 127-33, 2006.
GRANDORI, A. An organizational assessment of inter-firm coordination modes. Organization Studies, v. 18, n. 6, p. 897-925, 1997.
GRANDORI, A.; SODA, G. Inter-firm networks: antecedents, mechanisms and forms. Organization Studies, v. 16, n. 2, p. 183-214, mar. 1995.
GRANOVETTER, M. Economic action and social structure: a theory of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, v. 91, n. 3, p. 481-510, nov. 1985.
GRAVIER, M. Supply chain network evolution: demand-based drivers of interfirm governance evolution. 2007. Dissertation (Doctor of Philosophy) - University of North Texas, Texas, 2007.
GULATI, R. Alliances and network. Strategic Management Journal, v. 19, p. 293-317, 1998.
HASLAM, A.; OAKES, P.; TURNER, J.; MCGARTY, C. Social identity, self-categorization, and the perceived homogeneity of ingroups and outgroups: the interaction between social motivation and cognition. In: SORRENTINO, R.; HIGGINS, E. (Ed.). Handbook of motivation and cognition: the interpersonal context. New York: Guilford Press, 1996. v. 3, p. 182-222.
HUI, E.; TSANG, A. The inter-organizational relationship in a multi-contractor business network. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, v. 12, n. 3, p. 252-66, 2006.
IBERT, O.; STEIN, A. Spatialities of governance - spatial imaginations associated with market, hierarchy, networks and communities. Geography Compass, v. 6, n. 10, p. 602-16, 2012.
JACOMOSSI, F.; SILVA, M. Influência da incerteza ambiental na utilização de sistemas de controle gerencial em uma instituição de ensino superior. Revista de Gestão, São Paulo, v. 23, n. 1, p. 75-85, 2016.
JAUCH, L.; KRAFT, K. Strategic management of uncertainty. Academy of Management Review, v. 11, n. 4, p. 777-90, out. 1986.
JONES, C.; HESTERLY, W.; BORGATTI, S. A general theory of network governance: exchange conditions and social mechanisms. Academy of Management Review, v. 22, n. 4, p. 911-45, out. 1997.
KOKA, B.; MADHAVAN, R.; PRESCOTT, I. The evolution of interfirm networks: environmental effects on patterns of network change. Academy of Management Review, v. 31, n. 3, p. 721-37, 2006.
LEIBLEIN, M. The choice of organizational governance form and performance: predictions from transaction cost, resource-based, and real options theories. Journal of Management, v. 29, n. 6, p. 937-61, 2003.
LYON, S. The hidden labor of fair trade. Labor: Studies in Working-Class History of the Americas, v. 12, n. 1/2, p. 159-76, 2015.
LUO, Y.; LIANG, F.; MA, Z. The effects of contractual governance and relational governance on construction project performance: an empirical study. International Journal of Digital Content Technology and its Applications, v. 7, n. 8, p. 741-9, 2013.
MILAGRES, R.; SILVA, S.; REZENDE, O. Governança cooperativa. In: BRASIL. Conselho Nacional de Secretários de Saúde. CONASS Debate – Governança Regional das Redes de Atenção à Saúde. Brasilia: CONASS, 2016. p. 14-48. (Série CONASS Debates, 6).
MILLIKEN, F. Three types of perceived uncertainty about the environment: state, effect, and response uncertainty. Academy of Management Review, v. 12, n. 1, p. 133-43, jan. 1987.
MINAYO, M. O desafio do conhecimento. 10. ed. São Paulo: Hucitec, 2007.
MORENO, J. Psicodrama. São Paulo: Cultrix, 1978.
MORGAN, R.; HUNT, S. The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, v. 58, n. 3, p. 20-38, 1994.
OLSON, M. The logic of collective action. Cambridge: Harvard University, 1965.
PARK, C.; WILDING, M. An exploratory study on the potential of social enterprise to act as the institutional glue of network governance. The Social Science Journal, v. 51, n. 1, p. 120-9, 2014.
PFEFFER, J.; SALANCICK, G. The external control of organizations: a resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row, 1978.
PILBEAM, C.; ALVAREZ, G.; WILSON, H. The governance of supply networks: a systematic literature review. Supply Chain Management, v. 17, n. 4, p. 358-76, 2012.
POWELL, W. Neither market nor hierarchy: network forms of organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, v. 12, p. 295-336, 1990.
PROVAN, K.; KENIS, P. Modes of network governance: structure, management and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, v. 18, n. 2, p. 229-52, 2007.
RAEYMAECKERS, P. From a bird's eye view? A comparative analysis of governance and network integration among human service organizations. Journal of Social Service Research, v. 39, n. 3, p. 416-31, 2013.
RHODES, R. The new governance: governing without government. Political Studies, v. 44, n. 4, p. 652-67, 1996.
SCHUESLER, E.; DECKER, C.; LERCH, F. Networks of clusters: a governance perspective. Industry and innovation, v. 20, n. 4, p. 357-77, 2013.
SERVA, M.; DIAS, T.; ALPERSTEDT, G. Paradigma da complexidade e teoria das organizações: uma reflexão epistemológica. Revista de Administração de Empresas - RAE, São Paulo, v. 50, n. 3, p. 276-87, jul./set. 2010.
SPAN, K. et al. The relationship between governance roles and performance in local public interorganizational networks: a conceptual analysis. American Review of Public Administration, v. 42, n. 2, p. 186-201, 2012.
TEPIC, M. et al. The role of structural and relational governance in creating stable innovation networks: insights from sustainability-oriented Dutch innovation networks. Journal on Chain and Network Science, v. 11, n. 3, p. 197-211, 2011.
THOMPSON, J. Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967.
YEH, Y. Critical influence of relational governance on relationship value in strategic supply management. European Business Review, v. 28, n. 2, p. 137-54, 2016.
WHITFORD, J. After the outsourcing: networks, institutions, and the new old economy. 2003. PhD thesis (Department of Sociology) - The University of Wisconsin, United States, 2003.
WILLIAMSON, O. Transaction cost economics and organization theory. In: SMELSER, N. J.; SWEDBERG, R. (Ed.). The handbook of economic sociology. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995. p. 77-107.
WILLIAMSON, O. The economic institutions of capitalism. New York: Free Press, 1986.
ZAHEER, A.; GOZUBUYUK, R.; MILANOV, H. It’s the connections: the network perspective in interorganizational research. Academy of Management Perspectives, v. 24, n. 1, p. 62-77, 2010.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Direitos Autorais para artigos publicados nesta revista são do autor, com direitos de primeira publicação para a revista. Em virtude de aparecerem nesta revista de acesso público, os artigos são de uso gratuito, com atribuições próprias, em aplicações educacionais e não-comerciais.
